Skip to main content
Online ISSN: 2622-5506
Articles

Improving 7th-grade junior high school mathematics achievement through numbered heads together

Nuryani Dwi Astuti (1), Widowati Pusporini (2)
(1) Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia (2) Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v3i2.70

Keywords

cooperative learning achievement type NHT

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to improve the mathematics learning outcomes of class VII A students with the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) cooperative learning model on the triangle material at SMP Taman Dewasa Ibu Pawiyatan Yogyakarta. This type of research is classroom action research, while the method in this research is quantitative by collecting data through documents and tests. The subjects of this study were 21 students of class VII-A. The test instruments used were the pretest and posttest (evaluation questions in cycle I and cycle II) consisting of 20 multiple-choice questions. The data analysis technique of the mathematics learning achievement test was carried out by calculating the class average score. The results showed that there was an increase in mathematics learning achievement. This is indicated by an increase in the average percentage of student mathematics learning outcomes which increased from an average initial value of 48.33 to 67.86 in the first cycle and in the second cycle to 75.93. So it can be concluded that the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) cooperative learning model can improve the mathematics learning outcomes of class VII A students on triangle material.

References

  1. Agustin, S., Ariyanto, S., & Sukmaantara, I. P. (2013). The effect of using numbered head together technique on the eighth grade students’ reading comprehension achievement at SMPN 2 Tanggul Jember. Pancaran Pendidikan, 2(3), 201–210. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/pancaran/article/view/715
  2. Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
  3. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (2007). Tes psikologi= Psychological testing (B. Molan (ed.); (trans) Im). PT Prehanllindo.
  4. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
  5. Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (5th ed.). Bumi Aksara.
  6. Azwar, S. (2014). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.
  7. Daryono, R. W., Yolando, A. P., Jaedun, A., & Hidayat, N. (2020). Competency of vocational schools required by construction industry in consultants’ supervisor. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1456(012057), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012057
  8. Fanolong, T., Bugis, R., Azwan, A., Hanapi, H., & Handayani, N. (2016). The students’ reading ability improvement through numbered head together (NHT) technique. Jurnal Jupiter, 14(2), 67–78.
  9. Fitria, H., Kristiawan, M., & Rahmat, N. (2019). Upaya meningkatkan kompetensi guru melalui pelatihan penelitian tindakan kelas. Abdimas Unwahas, 4(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.31942/abd.v4i1.2690
  10. Ghufron, M. A. (2018). Revolusi industri 4.0: tantangan, peluang dan solusi bagi dunia pendidikan. In Seminar Nasional Dan Diskusi Panel Multidisiplin Hasil Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 332–337.
  11. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
  12. Halim, S., Boleng, D. T., & Labulan, P. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning dan number head together terhadap aktivitas, motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 14(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.29303/ jpm.v14.i1.569
  13. Handarini, D. M. (2019). Kontribusi faktor-faktor non-kognitif pada prestasi belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 1(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v1i2.22
  14. Ibrahim, M. (2000). Pembelajaran kooperatif. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
  15. Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. Nelson Education.
  16. Kartowagiran, B., Hadi, S., Wahyumiani, N., Alfarisa, F., & Pusporini, W. (2019). Effectiveness of the AA “4C” authentic assessment model: A single-case-research (SCR). New Educational Review, 57(2011), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2019.57.3.16
  17. Leasa, M., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). The effect of numbered heads together (NHT) cooperative learning model on the cognitive achievement of students with different academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 795(1), 012071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/795/1/012071
  18. Lestari, F., Saryantono, B., Syazali, M., Saregar, A., Madiyo, M., Jauhariyah, D., & Umam, R. (2019). Cooperative learning application with the method of “network tree concept map” : Based on japanese learning system approach. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.471466
  19. Nur, M. I., Salam, M., & Hasnawati, H. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe number heads together terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Tongkuno. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36709/jppm.v4i1.3055
  20. Omeri, N. (2015). Pentingnya pendidikan karakter dalam dunia pendidikan. Manajer Pendidikan, 9(3), 464–468. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/manajerpendidikan/article/view/1145
  21. Rabgay, T. (2018). The effect of using cooperative learning method on tenth grade students’ learning achievement and attitude towards biology. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11218a
  22. Rahayu, S., & Suningsih, A. (2018). The effects of type learning model numbered head together and think pair share. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v1i1.27
  23. Rattanatumma, T., & Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of STAD model and problem based learning in mathematics learning achievement and problem solving ability. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 194–199.
  24. Setiawan, A., Pusporini, W., & Dardjito, H. (2020). Observation instrument for student social attitude in primary schools: Validity and reliability. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i1.31868
  25. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.
  26. Susanto, R., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2019). Thinking actively in social contexts for improving the creating thinking skills. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 2(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v2i1.14
  27. Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. M. (2010). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (7th ed.). Pearson.
  28. Widodo, S. A. (2015). Keefektivan team accelerated instruction terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v6i2.4388
  29. Wijaya, E. Y., Sudjimat, D. A., & Nyoto, A. (2016). Transformasi pendidikan abad 21 sebagai tuntutan pengembangan sumber daya manusia di era global. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 1(26), 263–278.
  30. Yenni, R. F. (2016). Penggunaan metode numbered head together (NHT) dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(2), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v9i2.1006
  31. Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad ke-21: Keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 2(2), 1–17.