Skip to main content
Online ISSN: 2622-5506
Articles

The effectiveness of think-pair-share model in the reading class among tenth-graders of vocational high school students

Didik Rinan Sumekto (1)
(1) Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v8i1.331

Keywords

Narrative reading learning effectiveness think-pair-share tenth-graders experience

Abstract

This study aims at assessing the tenth-graders’ reading achievements at the Vocational High School whose organizationally affiliates with Muhammadiyah Islamic organization in Seyegan Sleman through the think-pair-share model. Thirty-six (n = 36) students of tenth-graders of the vocational high school participated as the respondents. Data collection used tenth-graders’ reading test and learning observation. Quantitative data were statistically analyzed by the SPSS program to gain the descriptive analyses of the test, while qualitative data analyzed by qualifying the observational-based session descriptively. The finding of the test also noted that the lowest score of reading gained 45.00 and the highest score was 100.00 through the analytic scoring assessment. Meanwhile, the mean was 78.89 and the standard deviation was 14.289 (n = 36). The overall achievement of reading was in good category with 25.0%, while the finding of the observation showed that the tenth graders were able to work with their friends in reading class by conducting the think-pair-share model.

References

  1. Alexander, J., & Jarman, R. (2018). The pleasures of reading non-fiction. Literacy, 52(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12152
  2. Al-Qahtani, A. A. (2021). Reading English as a foreign language: The interplay of abilities and strategies. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 580–588. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31738
  3. Ben-Yehudah, G., Hirshorn, E. A., Simcox, T., Perfetti, C. A., & Fiez, J. A. (2019). Chinese-English bilinguals transfer L1 lexical reading procedures and holistic orthographic coding to L2 English. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.01.002
  4. Cheng, R. T. -J. (2016). Reading online in foreign languages: A study of strategy use. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2567
  5. Commodari, E., Guarnera, M., Di Stefano, A., & Di Nuovo, S. (2019). Children learn to read: How visual analysis and mental imagery contribute to the reading performances at different stages of reading acquisition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09671-w
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angles: SAGE Publications Ltd. file:///Users/didik_r_sumekto/Downloads/Creswell-ResearchDesign.pdf
  7. Drieghe, D., Veldre, A., Fitzsimmons, G., Ashby, J., & Andrews, S. (2019). The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading revisited. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 26(2), 616–621. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01590-0
  8. Elleman, A. M., Steacy, L. M., Olinghouse, N. G., & Compton, D. L. (2017). Examining child and word characteristics in vocabulary learning of struggling readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1265970
  9. Garces-Bascal, R. M., Tupas, R., Kaur, S., Paculdar, A. M., & Baja, E. S. (2018). Reading for pleasure: Whose job is it to build lifelong readers in the classroom? Literacy, 52(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12151
  10. Gopal, R., & Singh, C. K. S. (2020). Arising reading patterns in understanding literary texts. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16663
  11. Ho, T. H. (2016). Reading attitudes and reading habits of Vietnamese undergraduate students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Flinders University. Retrieved 27 March 2023, from https://flex.flinders.edu.au/file/c9641004-c5ed-4496-9719-79c48b690b92/1/ThesisHo2016.pdf
  12. Jung, J., & Révész, A. (2018). The effects of reading activity characteristics on L2 reading processes and noticing of glossed constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000165
  13. Kamal, S. M. (2019). Developing EFL learners vocabulary by reading English comprehension in EFL classroom. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 8(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.23.2019.81.28.35
  14. Kanniainen, L., Kiili, C., Tolvanen, A., Aro, M., & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2019). Literacy skills and online research and comprehension: Struggling readers face difficulties online. Reading and Writing, 32, 2201–2222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09944-9
  15. Kazemi, A., Bagheri, M. S., & Rassaei, E. (2020). Dynamic assessment in English classrooms: Fostering learners’ reading comprehension and motivation. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1788912
  16. Kumara, B., & Kumar, S. B T. (2019). Impact of reading habits on the academic achievements: A survey. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1(1), 1–16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332538007_Impact_of_Reading_habits_on_the_Academic_Achievements_A_Survey
  17. Kung, F-. W. (2017). Teaching second language reading comprehension: The effects of classroom materials and reading strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1364252
  18. Kucirkova, N., & Cremin, T. (2017). Personalised reading for pleasure with digital libraries: Towards a pedagogy of practice and design. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(5), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1375458
  19. Kucirkova, N., Littleton, K., & Cremin, T. (2016). Young children’s reading for pleasure with digital books: Six key facets of engagement. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1118441
  20. Liu, H. (2020). Does questioning strategy facilitate second language (L2) reading comprehension? The effects of comprehension measures and insights from reader perception. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(2), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.1233
  21. Liu, Y., Liu, H., Xu, Y., & Lu, H. (2020). Online English reading instruction in the ESL classroom based on constructivism. Journal of Educational Technology System, 9(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519899341
  22. Memiş, A. D., & Kandemir, H. (2019). The relationship between the study habits and attitudes and metacognitive reading comprehension self-awareness, reading comprehension, reading attitudes. World Journal of Education, 9(4), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n4p133
  23. Merga, M. K. (2017). What would make children read for pleasure more frequently? English in Education, 51(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12143
  24. Mesgar, M., & Tafazoli, D. (2018). Online metacognitive reading strategies by internal and external locus of control. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 8(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.2018010103
  25. Orkin, M., Pott, M., Wolf, M., May, S., & Brand E. (2017). Beyond gold stars: Improving the skills and engagement of struggling readers through intrinsic motivation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(3), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1387834
  26. Ragan, A., Kammer, J., Atkin, C., & Burress, R. (2019). Learning to read online: The effect of instruction on e-textbook use. Library Hi Tech, 37(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2018-0011
  27. Roberts, G. J., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Miciak, J. (2019). Problem behaviors and response to reading intervention for upper elementary students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 42(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519865263
  28. Satriani, E. (2019). Online reading resources among EFL (English foreign language) students: Do they promote reading habit? Journal of English for Academic, 6(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2019.vol6(1).2528
  29. Shih, H. -C. J., & Huang, S. C. (2018). EFL learners’ metacognitive strategy use in reading tests. English Teaching & Learning, 42(4), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-018-0007-3
  30. Soto, C., Gutierrez de Blume, A. P., Bernal, M. A. C., & Castro, M. A. C. (2020). The role of meta-cognitive cues on the comprehension of proficient and poor readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(3), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12303
  31. Spencer, M., Gilmour, A. F., Miller, A. C., Emerson, A. M., Saha, N. M., & Cutting, L. E. (2019). Understanding the influence of text complexity and question type on reading outcomes. Reading and Writing, 32(2), 603–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9883-0
  32. Stearns, S. A. (2017). Student responsible learning: Getting students to read online discussions. College Teaching, 65(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2016.1244654
  33. Su, O. B. (2016). Extensive reading: A study of its effects on Turkish EFL learners' general language proficiency in an input-based setting [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Kansas. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/dad37c6b-b03c-4b3f-8f52-33be75ced1c0/content
  34. Sumekto, D. R., Taufiqulloh, T., & Aryani, M. R. D. (2022). The EFL students’ online reading determinants: Perceiving from their selected folklore readings. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.36776
  35. Voellinger, V. A., Spörer, N., Lubbe, D., & Brunstein, J. C. (2018). A path analytic test of the reading strategies mediation model: Relating cognitive competences and motivational influences to individual differences in fifth graders’ reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(6), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1412930
  36. Whitten, C., Labby, S., & Sullivan, S. L. (2016). The impact of pleasure reading on academic success. The Journal of Multidisciplinary Graduate Research, 2(1), 48–64. https://jmgr-ojs-shsu.tdl.org/jmgr/article/view/11/10
  37. Willard, J., & Buddie, A. (2019). Enhancing empathy and reading for pleasure in psychology of gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(3), 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319845616
  38. Wu, J. Y., & Peng, Y. -C. (2017). The modality effect on reading literacy: Perspectives from students’ online reading habits, cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and web navigation skills across regions. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1224251