Skip to main content
Online ISSN: 2622-5506
Articles

Is difficult item relevant to higher cognitive process level?: Proof from the geomorphology topic assessment based on Bloom’s and Marzano cognitive taxonomy

Listyo Yudha Irawan (1), Siti Nur Farihah (2), Agus Dwi Febrianto (3), Aulia Amatullah (4), Nurul Ratnawati (5), Bayu Kurniawan (6)
(1) Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia (2) Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia (3) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia (4) Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia (5) Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia (6) Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v8i2.290

Keywords

HOTS Assessment Item Difficulty Geomorphology

Abstract

Assessment of learning outcomes needs to consider the appropriateness between the level of difficulty of questions and the cognitive level being measured, especially in Physical Geography–Geomorphology material that requires higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). This study aims to analyze the relationship between the level of difficulty of questions and cognitive levels as defined by Bloom's Taxonomy and Marzano's Taxonomy. The study employs a quantitative descriptive approach by developing ten essay-type questions classified according to both taxonomies. The difficulty level analysis was conducted using Classical Test Theory (CTT) with the parameter of the proportion of participants who answered correctly. The research results indicate that difficulty levels do not always correlate with cognitive levels. In Bloom's Taxonomy, C1 questions tend to be the easiest, while in Marzano's Taxonomy, C3 questions are actually easier than other levels. This demonstrates that difficulty levels and cognitive levels are two distinct concepts, so the perception that HOTS questions are always difficult is not entirely accurate. In conclusion, the development of assessment instruments must consider the relationship between learning objectives, cognitive levels, and item characteristics. The study recommends integrating HOTS-based learning into geomorphology material through the use of contextual media and geospatial technology to support meaningful assessment and the development of 21st-century skills.

References

  1. Agra, G., Formiga, N. S., de Oliveira, P. S., Costa, M. M. L., Fernandes, M. D. G. M., & da Nóbrega, M. M. L. (2019). Analysis of the concept of meaningful learning in light of the Ausubel’s theory. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72(1), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0691
  2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
  3. Astuti, P. (2018). Kemampuan literasi matematika dan kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi. PRISMA: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 263–268. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/
  4. Azwar, S. (2018). Metode penelitian psikologi (Edisi II). Pustaka Pelajar. http://pustakapelajar.co.id/buku/metode-penelitian-psikologi-ed-2/
  5. Azzahra, D., Dewi, P., Mutia, N., & Asna, A. (2025). Belajar dan perilaku belajar. Formatif: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(2), 58–69. https://glonus.org/index.php/formatif/article/view/158/123
  6. Biazus, M. de O., & Mahtari, S. (2022). The impact of project-based learning (PjBL) model on secondary students’ creative thinking skills. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i1.752
  7. Daryanto. (2010). Evaluasi pendidikan (6th ed.). Rineka Cipta. https://perpustakaan.binadarma.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=3754
  8. Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Analisis kualitas soal kemampuan membedakan rangkaian seri dan paralel melalui teori tes klasik dan model Rasch. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i1.24080
  9. Fanani, M. (2018). Strategi pengembangan soal HOTS pada Kurikulum 2013. EDUDEENA, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v2i1.582
  10. Hardina. (2025). Analisis soal higher order thinking skills (HOTS) pada buku Cakap Berbahasa dan Bersastra Indonesia kelas XI SMA [Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Makassar]. https://lib.unm.ac.id/storage/file_thesis/bjtKuxwedQB5y62TdUXqIx5TNeRwA76afM7D1KlM.pdf
  11. HSB, T. S., & Mukminan, M. (2024). Development of hydrosphere geography learning media to improve higher order thinking skills (HOTS). International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1411
  12. Inayati, N. L., Fatimah, A. N., Azzahra, S. E., & Alamsyah, I. R. (2024). Implementasi tes essay dalam evaluasi pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 4(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v4i1.2724
  13. Irawan, L. Y., Farihah, S. N., Prasetyo, W. E., Azizah, V., Hartono, R., Masruroh, H., & Mapa, M. T. (2024). The effectivity of community-based early warning system on reducing Semeru eruption impact post-eruption 2021. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1314(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1314/1/012037
  14. Irawan, L. Y., Sumarmi, S., Febrianto, A. D., Sholeha, A. W., Dirgantara, S. D., Nadhifah, M. R., Wahono, F., & Panoto, D. (2022). Local material in improving students’ knowledge and comprehension of natural hazards. In Exploring new horizons and challenges for social studies in a new normal (pp. 88–93). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003290865-17
  15. Is’ad, N., & Sukarmin, S. (2022). Implementation of problem-solving learning model assisted by student worksheets to improve critical thinking skills in the context of reaction rate. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3296
  16. Kaka, L., Bano, V. O., & Njoeroemana, Y. (2024). Efektivitas analisis butir soal pilihan ganda menggunakan aplikasi Anates di SMPN 2 Kanatang. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 4(9), 1441–1450. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v4i9.3124
  17. Kurnianto, F. A. (2019). Proses geomorfologi dan kaitannya dengan tipologi wilayah. Majalah Pembelajaran Geografi, 2(2), 131–147. https://mpg.jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/PGEO/article/download/13538/7097/28164
  18. Laksono, P. J. (2018). Pengembangan dan penggunaan instrumen two-tier multiple choice pada materi termokimia untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir kritis. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v2i2.2646
  19. Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Developing higher level thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 9. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1097083.pdf
  20. Manek, A. H. (2023). Pengaruh model spatial based learning (SBL) terhadap kemampuan berpikir spasial mahasiswa pada mata kuliah Praktek Kerja Lapangan Geografi (PKLG). Jurnal Geoedusains, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30872/geoedusains.v4i1.2131
  21. Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252
  22. Nuridayanti, Arthur, R., Rahayu, W., & Ishak, A. M. (2024). Analisis butir soal ujian tengah semester mata kuliah sistem digital dengan pendekatan Rasch model. INTEC Journal: Information, Technology, Education Journal, 3(3), 36–42. http://journal.unm.ac.id/index.php/INTEC/article/view/5376/3394
  23. Rajagukguk, M. J. T., & Naibaho, D. (2023). Mampu memilih soal berdasarkan tingkat kesukaran. Pediaqu: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(4), 12736–12747. https://publisherqu.com/index.php/pediaqu/article/view/701/645
  24. Ramadhan, A. F., & Hidayatullah, R. S. (2023). Analisis kualitas butir soal ujian satuan pendidikan (USP) materi C2 teknik pemesinan kelas XII di SMK PGRI 1 Lamongan melalui model Rasch. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, 12(3), 1–10. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-pendidikan-teknik-mesin/article/view/56146
  25. Ramdhani, S. S., Susanti, R., & Meilinda. (2024). Cognitive level of Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) questions based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.2.785
  26. Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.215
  27. Ridha, A. R., Rahmatullah, A., Nisrina, A., Firdaus, N., & Wicaksono, Y. (2025). Hasil belajar sebagai objek penilaian (kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik). INOVASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengembangan Pendidikan, 3(3), 1–8. https://ejournal.lpipb.com/index.php/inovasi
  28. Rizqi, I., & Rahmah, N. (2023). Peningkatan keterampilan geografis peserta didik di pembelajaran abad 21. Geography Science Education Journal (GEOSEE), 4. http://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/geosee/index
  29. Saputri, A. F., Susilo, D. A., & Fayeldi, T. (2019). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik menyelesaikan soal cerita ditinjau dari taksonomi Marzano. Semnas SENASTEK Unikama 2019, 2. http://conference.unikama.ac.id/artikel/index.php/senastek/article/view/164/139
  30. Saputri, H. A., Zulhijrah, Larasati, N. J., & Shaleh. (2023). Analisis instrumen asesmen: Validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran dan daya beda butir soal. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP Universitas Mandiri, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i5.2268
  31. Setiyawan, R. A., & Wijayanti, P. S. (2020). Analisis kualitas instrumen untuk mengukur kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa selama pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi. Jurnal Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistika, 1(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v1i2
  32. Son, A. L. (2019). Instrumentasi pemecahan masalah matematis: Analisis reliabilitas, validitas, tingkat kesukaran dan daya beda butir soal. Gema Wiralodra, 10(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.31943/gemawiralodra.v10i1.8
  33. Suhendro, Sugandi, D., & Ruhimat, M. (2021). Analysis on factors influencing geography teachers’ ability in constructing high-order thinking skills (HOTS) assessment instrument. Geosfera Indonesia, 6(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.19184/geosi.v6i2.21428
  34. Sun, L., Hu, L., Zhou, D., & Yang, W. (2023). Evaluation and developmental suggestions on undergraduates’ computational thinking: A theoretical framework guided by Marzano’s new taxonomy. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6588–6610. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2042311
  35. Sutiani, A., Situmorang, M., & Silalahi, A. (2021). Implementation of an inquiry learning model with science literacy to improve student critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1428a
  36. Tiban, F. A., Achmad, N., & Zakiyah, S. (2021). Analisis kualitas tes hasil belajar matematika buatan guru di SMP Negeri 4 Gorontalo. Jambura Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.34312/jmathedu.v2i2.11103
  37. Ulfah, U., & Arifudin, O. (2023). Analisis teori taksonomi Bloom pada pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Amar: Ekonomi Syariah, Perbankan Syariah, Agama Islam, Manajemen dan Pendidikan, 4(1), 13–22. https://ojs-steialamar.org/index.php/JAA/article/view/87
  38. Umami, M. (2018). Penilaian autentik pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Kependidikan, 6(2), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v6i2.2259
  39. Widyawati, A., Siti, I. A., & Dwiningrum, R. (2021). Pembelajaran ethnosciences di era revolusi industri 4.0 sebagai pemacu higher order thinking skills (HOTS). Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 9(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v9i1.38049
  40. Yen, T. S., & Halili, S. H. (2015). Effective teaching of higher-order thinking (HOT) in education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 3(2), 41–47. https://tojqih.net/journals/tojdel/articles/v03i02/v03i02-04.pdf