Skip to main content
Online ISSN: 2622-5506
Articles

Resilience of Gen-Z people with disabilities against the dark joke phenomenon: Qualitative research

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v7i1.248

Abstract

Humor or jokes have become an integral part of social life. The Gen-Z group's response to humor is strange, especially for those above 25 years old. It is often characterized by an absurd and dark sense of humor. This will certainly cause contradictions from many parties, especially for people with disabilities who feel themselves to be the butt of jokes. In responding to dark jokes, a person with a disability uses resilience to maintain their self-actualization in the community. The objectives of this study are (1) to analyze the resilience dynamics of Gen-Z people with physical disabilities towards the dark joke phenomenon. The method used in this research is qualitative research with phenomenological design. Data collection was conducted by in-depth interviews with 3 key informants and 3 supporting informants. The results of this study indicate that aspects of resilience that arise include (1) emotion regulation; (2) Reaching out; (3) Imput control of negative behavior; (4) use of dark jokes; (5) optimism and support from the surrounding environment; (6) self-adjustment; and (7) self-efficacy. People with disabilities also use coping mechanisms as a problem-solving strategy that includes emotion focused coping and problem focused coping. Through resilience and coping owned by people with disabilities, they are able to actualize themselves and accept their physical limitations.

References

  1. Agustina, E., & Valentina, T. D. (2023). Penerimaan diri penyandang disabilitas. Psychopreneur Journal, 7(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.37715/psy.v7i1.3534
  2. Bottomley, J. (2024). Quick reference dictionary for physical therapy. Taylor & Francis.
  3. Caesaria, S. D., & Adit, A. (2021). “Dark Jokes” Bisa dikaji secara ilmiah, begini kata Akademisi Unpad. Kompas. https://www.kompas.com/edu/read/2021/01/25/113953171/dark-jokes-bisa-dikaji-secara-ilmiah-begini-kata-akademisi-unpad?page=all#google_vignette
  4. Dalyan, M., Darwis, M., Rahman, F., & Latjuba, A. Y. (2022). Cultural discourse in Indonesian humor: A case study of some short dialogues. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(5), 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1205.24
  5. Damanik, S. F., & Mulyadi. (2020). Indonesian humorous status in social media: An application of script-based semantic theory of humour. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 657–671. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17237
  6. Dyer, J. G., & McGuinness, T. M. (1996). Resilience: Analysis of the concept. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 10(5), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9417(96)80036-7
  7. Edi, F. R. S. (2016). Teori wawancara psikodignostik. Penerbit LeutikaPrio.
  8. Etmanski, A. (2020). The power of disability: 10 lessons for surviving, thriving, and changing the world. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  9. Fine, S. B. (1991). Resilience and human adaptability: Who rises above adversity? The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(6), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.6.493
  10. Forry, L. E. (2022). A parents guide to understanding Gen Z humor. Family Education. https://www.familyeducation.com/teens/a-parents-guide-to-understanding-gen-z-humor
  11. Garjito, D., & Mulyono, H. (2020). Dianggap Dark Joke, pemberi bola ke penyandang disabilitas tuai dukungan. Suara.Com. https://www.suara.com/news/2020/12/20/195733/dianggap-dark-joke-pemberi-bola-ke-penyandang-disabilitas-tuai-dukungan
  12. Hendriani, W. (2022). Resiliensi psikologi sebuah pengantar. Prenada Media.
  13. Khan, S. N. (2014). Qualitative research method - phenomenology. Asian Social Science, 10(21), 298. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n21p298
  14. Larasati, R. P. (2022). Resiliensi pada mahasiswa penyandang disabilitas di Universitas Negeri Malang [Universitas Negeri Malang]. https://repository.um.ac.id/265231/
  15. Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory. In Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_1
  16. Nilawaty P., C. (2021). Blindman Jack: Silakan disabilitas jadi lawakan, tetapi pikir risiko stigma. TEMPO. https://www.tempo.co/politik/blindman-jack-silakan-disabilitas-jadi-lawakan-tetapi-pikir-risiko-stigma-470047
  17. Nugraheni, S., Agil Muzaki, Y., Rizqi Amelia, D., & Fatwa Anbiya, B. (2024). Strategi penguatan penggunaan bahasa Indonesia di kalangan Gen Z melalui media sosial. PENDIS (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.61721/pendis.v3i1.379
  18. Pratiwi, I., & Hartosujono, H. (2017). Resiliensi pada penyandang tuna daksa non bawaan. JURNAL SPIRITS, 5(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.30738/spirits.v5i1.1057
  19. Rahadi, D. R. (2020). Konsep penelitian kualitatif plus tutorial Nvivo. PT. Filda Fikrindo.
  20. Rahman, P. R. U., Dimala, C. P., Tourniawan, I., & Ramadan, R. (2024). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi stres pengasuhan pada orang tua anak berkebutuhan khusus. Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i1.771
  21. Reivich, K., & Shatte, A. (2002). The resilience factor: 7 skills for overcoming life’s inevitable obstacles. New York: Broadway Books.
  22. Riski Dwi, F., Suprapto, N., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2023). Implementation of hybrid learning and its impacts at a public junior school in Indonesia. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v3i3.116
  23. Romero, E. J., & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The use of humor in the workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.20591005
  24. Samson, A. C., & Gross, J. J. (2014). The dark and light sides of humor. In J. Gruber & J. T. Moskowitz (Eds.), Positive emotion: Integrating the light sides and dark sides.
  25. Sarwono, J. (2012). Strategi melakukan riset, kuantitatif, kualitatif, gabungan. Penerbit Andi.
  26. Savage, B. M., Lujan, H. L., Thipparthi, R. R., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2017). Humor, laughter, learning, and health! A brief review. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00030.2017
  27. Shiozaki, Y., Nagamatsu, S., Sato, K., & Bhattacharya, Y. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical validation of disaster resilience indicators. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 111(February), 104681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104681
  28. Susanto, D., Risnita, & Jailani, M. S. (2023). Teknik pemeriksaan keabsahan data dalam penelitian ilmiah. Jurnal QOSIM Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 1(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v1i1.60
  29. Zaelani, D. A., Yusuf, D. S., Mafruhat, A. Y., & Essa, W. Y. (2022). Tantangan dan peluang penyandang disabilitas fisik di Kota Bandung dalam memperoleh pekerjaan di masa Covid-19. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 15(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v15i1.13133
  30. Zahro, A. L. Z., & Darmawanti, I. (2022). Resilience of people with disabilities who have experienced bullying. Character Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 10(01), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.26740/cjpp.v10i1.53304