##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Yuli Prihatni

Pardimin Pardimin

Novia Dewi Anggasari

Abstract

This study aimed to determine how the teacher's assessment of student discipline attitudes has been done all this time. Knowing how to develop an instrument for assessing students 'disciplinary attitudes that is standard and feasible to use, including: (a) what indicators are appropriate to measure students' disciplinary attitudes. (b) how to develop indicators for assessing disciplinary attitudes into questionnaire items. (c) determine the validity and reliability of the student's disciplinary attitude assessment instrument. In the end, to find out the degree of discipline of senior high school students. This research is a research and development. The subjects in this study were 312 class XI students of SMA Negeri 1 Karangdowo. Data collection was carried out by distributing questionnaires. The data analysis used included Exploratory Factor Analysis, reliability analysis using Cronbach's Alpha, and descriptive analysis. The result showed (1) the assessment of disciplinary attitudes by the teacher had not used valid and reliable instruments. (2) the results of the development of the instrument obtain indicators of discipline attitude, which are divided into 3, namely: obeying the general rules of schools outside the teaching and learning activities, obeying the rules of teaching and learning, and attendance in class, and obeying the rules of the learning task. The construct validity test of 50 items was declared valid with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.898, which was divided into 15 factors. (3) the tendency of discipline attitude of class XI students of SMA Negeri 1 Karangdowo is in the medium category

References

Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Arifin, D. (2015). Pengembangan instrumen nilai kedisiplinan mata pelajaran pendidikan jasmani dan kesehatan pada SMP Negeri 2 Gombong Kabupaten Kebumen tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3(3), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v3i3.2250

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. McGraw Hill Book Company.

Chen, W.-B., & Gregory, A. (2009). Parental involvement as a protective factor during the transition to high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903231250

Dalmeri, D. (2014). Pendidikan untuk pengembangan karakter (Telaah terhadap gagasan Thomas Lickona dalam educating for character). Al-Ulum, 14(1), 269–288. http://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/au/article/view/260

Davidson, M. (2014). A character education research perspective for the 21st century. Journal of Character Education, 10(1), 77–84.

Fajaruddin, S., Retnawati, H., Wijaya, T. T., Ramadhan, S., & Prihatni, Y. (2021). Alhamdulillah, butir pengembangan instrumen penilaian artikel jurnal ilmiah dikatakan valid oleh para rater. Measurement In Educational Research (Meter), 1(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.33292/meter.v1i2.156

Kumaidi, K. (2014). Validitas dan pemvalidasian instrumen penilaian karakter. Seminar Psikometri Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Lickona, T. (2004). Educating for character : how our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam.

Mardapi, D. (2018). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non-tes (A. Setiawan (ed.)). Parama Publishing.

Mardapi, D., & Setiawan, A. (2018). Penilaian afektif. Nuha Medika.

McKinney, C., Brown, K., & Malkin, M. L. (2018). Parenting style, discipline, and parental psychopathology: gender dyadic interactions in emerging adults. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(1), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0865-7

Moenir, H. A. S. (2010). Management of public services in Indonesia. PT Bumi Aksara.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Olatunji, M. O. (2013). Teaching and assessing of affective characteristics: A critical missing link in online education. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(1), 96–107. http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/09.olatunji.pdf

Paparan Wakil Menteri Pendidikan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2014). Konsep dan implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Rahman, M. H. (2020). Analisis ranah psikomotor kompetensi dasar teknik pengukuran tanah kurikulum SMK Teknik Konstruksi dan Properti. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 17(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v17i1.23022

Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas dan karakteristik butir. Parama Publishing.

Sani, R. A. (2014). Pembelajaran saintifik untuk implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bumi Aksara.

Santoso, S. (2015). AMOS 22 untuk structural equation modelling. Elex Media Komputindo.

Siregar, E., & Nara, H. (2010). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran (J. Jamludin (ed.)). Ghalia Indonesia.

Sugiyono, S. (2006). Statistika untuk penelitian. CV. Alfabeta.

Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2015). Evaluasi program pembelajaran: panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik (Cet. ke-3). Pustaka Pelajar. https://doi.org/2013

Zubaedi, Z. (2011). Desain pendidikan karakter: Konsepsi dan aplikasinya dalam lembaga pendidikan. Kencana.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##