Nurwanto Nurwanto (1), Anisa Dwi Makrufi (2), Giri Wiyono (3)
This article aims to investigate how dialogic pedagogy was practiced while punitive approaches were dominant towards students who violated school rules as well as the student code of conduct. Previous studies primarily focused on the extent of effectiveness or the influential factors for students to comply with as well as violate student code of conduct. On the other hand, this writing highlights the importance of dialogic practices in school environments. As a case study, this study investigated two senior high schools, that is the public and private schools in Yogyakarta municipality. Through the documentary and interview analysis, the study found that even if the student code of conduct was punitive approach-based, it contains the potential for school practitioners to develop communications or dialogues, for example, between school practitioners themselves; and between school practitioners (school leaders and educators) and parents; and between school practitioners and students. More importantly, several school leaders and educators emphasized how dialogues could be practiced with students considered as the offenders of the school rules. This article concludes that empathetic and critical dialogues seem to be an alternative of student discipline enforcement, which has been largely practiced through the school rules.
Aslamiyah, S. S. (2020). Implementasi tata tertib sekolah dalam penanaman budaya disiplin siswa. TA'LIM: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 183-194.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chapman, J. L. (2009). Issues in contemporary documentary. Polity.
Curran, F. C., & Finch, M. A. (2020). Reforming school discipline: responses by school district leadership to revised state guidelines for student codes of conduct. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(2), 179-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20925893
Darder, A. (2018). The student guide to freire's pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
Erganila, T., Astuti, B., & Nhung, L. N. A. (2022). The development of individual counseling guidelines for assertive training techniques to improve student assertiveness in state senior high schools in Yogyakarta. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 4(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v4i2.101
Footer, N. S. (1996). Achieving fundamental fairness: The code of conduct. 1996(73), 19-33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.37119967304
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.; Vol. 2007). Continuum.
Fuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules, and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 119-157. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001119
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291-305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343390027003005
Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Guilherme, A. (2017). Understanding conflict resolution philosophically in a school setting: three different kinds of violence and dialogue. Journal of Peace Education, 14(2), 215-234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2017.1323728
Kadir, H. A. (2012). School gangs of Yogyakarta: Mass fighting strategies and masculine charisma in the city of students. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 13(4), 352-365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2012.697188
LaMorte, M. W. (2002). School law: Cases and concepts. ERIC.
Listiwikono, E. (2020). The effect of compliance with the school of norma (Code of conduct) school to the discipline of students even semester even MTs Ibrahimy at Calipuro Banyuwangi, East Java, Indonesia. J International Journal for Educational Vocational Studies, 2(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i3.2441
Masturoh, M., & Ridlo, S. J. J. o. B. E. (2020). Character building of environmental care on students in Sekolah Indonesia Kota Kinabalu (SIKK) Malaysia. 9(2), 193-201.
Noonan, B., Tunney, K., Fogal, B., & Sarich, C. (1999). Developing student codes of conduct: A case for parent-principal partnership. School Psychology International, 20(3), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034399203004
Novita, Y., Salmia, S., Hartanto, D., Aldo, N., & Alfiah, A. (2022). Role of teachers in the implementation of students’ code of conduct in economics learning process. J AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 4845-4852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1682
Prihatni, Y., Pardimin, P., & Anggasari, N. D. (2023). Instrument construct of student's discipline attitude: Validity and reliability. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 5(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v5i2.162
Raby, R. (2012). School rules: Obedience, discipline, and elusive democracy. University of Toronto Press.
Sumaryati, S., & Kurniasih, T. (2014). Tingkat kepatuhan tata tertib sekolah oleh siswa kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah 5 Yogyakarta. Jurnal Citizenship: Media Publikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan(Vol 3, No 2 (2014)), 165-178. http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Citizenship/article/view/10672
Thornberg, R. (2008). ‘It's not fair!’—Voicing pupils’ criticisms of school rules. J Children Society, 22(6), 418-428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00121.x
Thornberg, R. (2008). School children’s reasoning about school rules. Research Papers in Education, 23(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701651029
Trisnawati, D. D. J. K. M. d. K. (2013). Membangun disiplin dan tanggung jawab siswa SMA Khadijah Surabaya melalui implementasi tata tertib sekolah. 2(1), 397-411.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods the 6 edition (7, Ed.). Sage publications.