##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Nuril Huda

Imam Sujarwo

Abstract

The study aims to determine the level of feasibility of integrated mathematics learning evaluation teaching materials with verses of the Koran. The type of research used is research & development (R&D) by adopting the ADDIE model, namely Analyze, Design, and Develop. Data collection techniques using validation sheets and questionnaires. The product validation involved nine validators consisting of 3 material experts, three media experts, and 3 Islamic integration experts, while the practicality test involved 15, tadris mathematics students. The Aiken formula analyzed the validity test. The results showed that the results of the material and language feasibility test were 59.25% in the high category, the results of the media feasibility test were 55.55% in the medium category, and the results of the material integration feasibility test were 75.00% in the high category, and the test results practicality of 80% with the category of practical and a little revision. This mathematics learning evaluation textbook integrated with the verses of the Koran that were developed is feasible and can be used to support the lecture process.

References

Aiken, L. R. (2000). Psychological testing and assessment. Pearson.

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Revisi). Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, S. (2014). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Buhungo, T. J., Mustapa, D. A., & Arbie, A. (2021). Pengembagan perangkat pembelajaran team based learning- inquiry pada pembelajaran daring berbantuan WhatsApp Dan Zoom Meeting pada materi gerak lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 7(2), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v7i2.3079

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, (2003).

Fajaruddin, S., Retnawati, H., Wijaya, T. T., Ramadhan, S., & Prihatni, Y. (2021). Alhamdulillah, butir pengembangan instrumen penilaian artikel jurnal ilmiah dikatakan valid oleh para rater. Measurement In Educational Research (Meter), 1(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.33292/meter.v1i2.156

Febrianto, R., & Puspitaningsih, F. (2020). Pengembangan buku ajar evaluasi pembelajaran. Education Journal: Journal Educational Research and Development, 4(1), 1–18.

Gazali, R. Y. (2016). Pembelajaran matematika yang bermakna. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v2i3.47

Hasyim, N., & Haling, A. (2017). The e-learning needs analysis in graduate programs of Universitas Negeri Makassar. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v3i3.4748

Hernawan, A. H., Permasih, P., & Dewi, L. (2008). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Kharisma, J. Y., & Asman, A. (2018). Pengembangan bahan ajar matematika berbasis masalah berorientasi pada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan prestasi belajar matematika. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijome.v1i1.926

Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36.

Navarro, S., Zervas, P., Gesa, R., & Sampson, D. (2016). Developing teachers’ competences for designing inclusive learning experiences. Educational Technology and Society, 19(1), 17–27.

Prastowo, A. (2011). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. DIVA Press.

Pribadi, B. A. (2009). Desain sistem pembelajaran. PT Dian Rakyat.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian. Parama Publishing.

Winarso, W., & Wahid, S. (2020). Development of mathematics teaching device integrated with Quranic values: Issues, challenges, and implementation model. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.1.6

Yayuk, E. (2019). Pengembangan bahan ajar pembelajaran matematika untuk mahasiswa PGSD Semester 6. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(2), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i2.p172-182

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.