Citra Kurniawan (1), Punaji Setyosari (2), Waras Kamdi (3), Saida Ulfa (4)
Learning content has several forms of presentation, both visual and verbal, but students have different characteristics in processing information depending on their learning preferences. Some students have difficulty processing information without knowing what to do. This happens because students do not yet understand the characteristics of their learning styles. This research aims to study the VVQ instrument used by engineering students by measuring the validity and reliability of the VVQ instrument used. This research uses a statistical quantitative method approach to measure the validity and reliability of the instrument. The instrument development process goes through three stages: analysis and formulation of a literature review, development of the VVQ instrument, and measurement of the validity and reliability of the VVQ instrument. Development of question items based on pre-arranged and customized content categories. The development of VVQ in this study shows the validity value of rcount > rtable, rcount > 0.1966 for each item, and the Person Moment (rxy) correlation is moderate (0.40 < rxy < 0.60) and high (0.60 < rxy < 0.80 ). This research instrument is reliable because the data shows Cronbach's Alpha value rcount > rtable; 0.817 > 0.6319, and the difficulty level is proportional (medium and high). The VVQ instrument achieves validity and reliability based on the analysis items that have been measured. The implications of this research have a significant impact on adjusting learning content to be more personalized based on student learning preferences.
Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2015). A psychometric analysis of reliability and validity of the index of learning styles (ILS). International Journal of Psychological Studies, 7(3), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v7n3p46
Baukal, C., & Ausburn, L. (2014). Learning strategy and verbal-visual preferences for mechanical engineering students. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 121, 24.855.1-24.855.15. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--20746
Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2016). SPSS for psychologists (7th ed.). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57923-2
Brunsting, S., De Best-Waldhober, M., Brouwer, A. S., Riesch, H., & Reiner, D. (2013). Communicating CCS: Effects of text-only and text-and-visual depictions of CO2 storage on risk perceptions and attitudes. Energy Procedia, 37(0), 7318–7326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.670
Campos, A., López, A., González, M. Á., & Amor, Á. (2004). Imagery factors in the Spanish version of the verbalizer-visualizer questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 94(3_suppl), 1149–1154. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3c.1149-1154
El-Bishouty, M. M. (2019). Use of Felder and Silverman learning style model for online course design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9634-6
Fayombo, G. (2015). Learning styles, teaching strategies and academic achievement among some psychology undergraduates in Barbados. Caribbean Educational Research Journal, 3(2), 46–61. https://www.cavehill.uwi.edu/fhe/education/publications/past-issues/volume-3-number-2-september-2015/articles/learning-styles,-teaching-strategies-and-academic.aspx
Ismiyati, I., Pramusinto, H., Sholikah, M., & Yulianti, N. D. (2022). Meta-analysis of digital-based learning to improve learning outcomes. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 4(2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v4i2.114
Januchta, M. K., Hoffler, T., Thoma, G.-B., Prechtl, H., & Leutner, D. (2017). Visualizers versus verbalizers : Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – An eye-tracking study Computers in Human Behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 68(March), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028
Kirby, J. R., Moore, P. J., & Schofield, N. J. (1988). Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13(May 2014), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(88)90017-3
Koć‐Januchta, M. M., Höffler, T. N., Eckhardt, M., & Leutner, D. (2019). Does modality play a role? Visual‐verbal cognitive style and multimedia learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(6), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12381
Kolekar, S. V, Pai, R. M., & Pai, M. M. M. (2017). Prediction of learner’s profile based on learning styles in adaptive e-learning system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 12(06), 31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i06.6579
Kurniawan, C., Rizki Kusumaningrum, S., Surahman, E., & Zakaria, Z. (2022). Clustering of fine art-images as digital learning content using data mining-image analysis techniques. 2022 2nd International Conference on Information Technology and Education (ICIT&E), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITE54466.2022.9759840
Lee, S., Kim, S. H., & Kwon, B. C. (2017). VLAT: Development of a visualization literacy assessment test. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(1), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598920
Liu, C., Han, X., Li, Z., Ha, J., Peng, G., Meng, W., & He, M. (2019). A self-adaptive deep learning method for automated eye laterality detection based on color fundus photography. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0222025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222025
Liu, X., Zhang, X., Chen, W.-W., & Yuan, S.-M. (2020). Eye movement analysis of digital learning content for educational innovation. Sustainability, 12(6), 2518. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062518
Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 37(January), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003
McCormick, K., Salcedo, J., Peck, J., & Wheeler, A. (2017). SPSS statistics for data analysis and visualization. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Nafea, S. M., Siewe, F., & He, Y. (2019). On recommendation of learning objects using felder-silverman learning style model. IEEE Access, 7, 163034–163048. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935417
Peterson, M. O. (2016). Schemes for integrating text and image in the science textbook: Effects on comprehension and situational interest. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(6), 1365–1385. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.352a
Petsas, S., Raptis, G. E., & Katsanos, C. (2023). Turn & slide: Designing a puzzle game to Elicit the visualizer-verbalizer cognitive style. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 46–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42293-5_4
Sarwinda, K., Rohaeti, E., & Fatharani, M. (2020). The development of audio-visual media with contextual teaching learning approach to improve learning motivation and critical thinking skills. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 2(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v2i2.12
Supangat, & Saringat, M. Z. Bin. (2022). A systematic literature review enhanced felder silverman learning style models (FSLSM). 2022 Seventh International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC56845.2022.10006958
Toomey, N., & Heo, M. (2019). Cognitive ability and cognitive style: finding a connection through resource use behavior. Instructional Science, 47(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09491-4
Tuharea, J., Yanuarsyah, I., Nitin, M., R, M. R., Jie, L., & Jixiong, C. (2023). Utilizing multimedia technology in digital learning content development. Journal International Inspire Education Technology, 2(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.55849/jiiet.v2i2.454
Zarei, S., Roohani, A., & Jafarpour, A. A. (2015). The effect of visual/verbal learning style on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(6), 10–19. http://www.ijeionline.com/attachments/article/43/IJEI_Vol.2_No.6_2015-6-02.pdf