Sports education learning program evaluation in senior high school

Sulistyawati Sulistyawati(1*), Guntur Guntur(2),

(1) Department of Sport Science, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(2) Department of Sport Science, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Sports Education learning program evaluation has not been completely implemented. In relation to the statement, the study aims at evaluating the Sports Education learning program in Senior High School degree. Within the conduct of the study, the evaluation involved the CIPP model. Then, the informants for the study consisted of principals, vice principals, 2 Sports Education teachers and 10 students from each of Grade X, Grade XI and Grade XII. The data were gathered by means of interview, observation and documentation. For the data analysis technique, the researcher adopted the descriptive qualitative analysis. The results of the assessment in the study show that the results of context evaluation have already contained the Core Competence and the Basic Competence from 2013 Curriculum. The Components of Input have been good and the learning process of Soccer has been well-performing. Furthermore, the Components of Output show that the mean score of Core Competence 1 and Core Competence 2 belong to the “Good” category, Core Competence 3 belongs to the “Very Good” category (82.24) and Core Competence 4 belongs to the “Good” category (80.50). Therefore, it might be concluded that the Sports Education learning program in Senior High School has been well implemented. Thus, it is recommended that the Sports Education learning program should be continued with several revisions on the process.


Keywords


CIPP Evaluation; Sports Education Learning; evaluasi cipp; pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Afrianto, D. D. (2009). Persepsi guru non penjasorkes terhadap kinerja guru penjasorkes di SMA se-Kecamatan Gubug Kabupaten Grobogan. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Aldapit, E., & Suharjana, S. (2019). CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v1i2.10

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2009). Evaluasi program pendidikan (2nd ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP model for quality evaluation at school level: A case study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553

Dousti, M., Delkhah, S., & Darvishi, A. (2018). Evaluation of physical education faculty of University of Mazandaran. Journal of Physical Fitness, Medicine & Treatment in Sports, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.19080/JPFMTS.2018.02.555583

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., Borg, W. R. D., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Giriwijoyo, S., & Sidik, D. Z. (2012). Ilmu faal olahraga (fisiologi olahraga). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hamalik, O. (2002). Pendidikan guru berdasarkan pendekatan kompetensi. Bumi Aksara.

Hasan, S. H. (2008). Evaluasi kurikulum. Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dengan PT Remaja ….

Kardiyanto, D. W., Setijono, H., & Mintarto, E. (2017). The evaluation of indonesia paralympic coaching. European Journal of Special Education Research, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.891047

Kasriman, K. (2016). Evaluasi program pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani pada sekolah dasar negeri di Kecamatan Duren Sawit, Jakarta Timur. Prosiding Kolokium Doktor Dan Seminar Hasil Penelitian Hibah, 1(1), 365–382. https://proceedings.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/psd/article/view/18

Kusaeri, K., & Suprananto, S. (2012). Pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Graha Ilmu.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang kompetensi inti dan kompetensi dasar pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada pendidikan dasar dan pendidikan menengah, Pub. L. No. 24, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 5 (2016).

Mulyatiningsih, E. (2012). Metode penelitian terapan bidang pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Nurina, T., & Sukoco, P. (2014). Upaya peningkatan karakter siswa SMA dalam permainan bola basket melalui model TPSR. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 2(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v2i1.2605

Nuruhidin, A., Putra, F., Pamungkas, O. I., Ardiyanto, H., & Saputro, D. P. (2018). An evaluation of powerlifting and weightlifting development program. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v1i1.19

Panigrahi, M. R. (2012). Implementation of instructional supervision in secondary school: Approaches, praspects and problems. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 1(3), 59–67. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/star/article/view/98799

Patil, Y., & Kalekar, S. (2014). CIPP model for school evaluation. Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, 2(10), 2615–2619.

Prabowo, Y. (2009). Persepsi guru SMA se Kecamatan Tayu Kabupaten Pati terhadap kinerja guru mata pelajaran penjas orkes tahun 2008/2009. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Rosdiani, D. (2012). Model pembelajaran langsung dalam pendidikan jasmani dan kesehatan. Alfabeta.

Samsudin, S. (2008). Pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani dan kesehatan. Putra Grafika.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation. Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Sudijono, A. (2012). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R & D. Alfabeta.

Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2013). Evaluasi program pembelajaran: panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik. Pustaka Pelajar. https://doi.org/2013

Wirawan, W. (2011). Evaluasi teori, model, standar, aplikasi dan profesi. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Yudhianto, A. (2010). Persepsi guru non penjasorkes terhadap kinerja guru penjasorkes di SMP Negeri se Kecamatan Gunungpati Kota Semarang tahun 2009/2010. Universitas Negeri Semarang.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33292/petier.v2i1.31

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 89 times
FULLTEXT PDF - 8 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our Journal indexed by:


Creative Commons License
Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at 
http://petier.org/index.php/PETIER.

PETiER Stats