Science lesson plan evaluation for 7th grade secondary school: A learning process reflection

Nilia Fithriyyati(1*), Ika Maryani(2),

(1) SMP Negeri 1 Srumbung
(2) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The study aimed to determine the suitability of the Lesson Plan for 7th grade Secondary School with the Learning Process Standard based on the aspects of planning, implementation, and assessment. The particular research was an evaluation research with the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, and Product). The lesson plan documents were from five schools implementing the Curriculum 2006 and five schools implementing the Curriculum 2013. The respondents were 10 science teachers of 7th grade and 472 students. Data collection instruments were observation guides, questionnaires, interview guides, and documentation. Data analysis techniques were quantitative and qualitative. The Quantitative data was T-score; meanwhile, qualitative data analyzed descriptively. Lesson Plans with the rules of the Curriculum 2006 and Curriculum 2013 were the main documents in the evaluation. The results showed that (1) the suitability of the science lesson plan using KTSP (curriculum 2006) was in category of adequate suitable and lesson plan using K-13 (curriculum 2013) was in suitable category; (2) the suitability of the implementation of science learning using KTSP and K-13 was in category of adequate suitable; and (3) the suitability of the assessment of science learning using KTSP and K-13 was in category of adequate suitable. Generally, the documents of the science lesson plan were adequate suitable with the Learning Process Standards.

Keywords


learning process; secondary school; evaluation; lesson plan

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Anwar, R. (2014). Hal-hal yang mendasari penerapan Kurikulum 2013. Humaniora, 5(1), 97. http://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v5i1.2987

Ariyanti, D., & Kuswanto, H. (2014). Evaluasi guru dalam pembelajaran sains pada implementasi kurikulum 2013. In Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1984). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. New York, NY: Times Mirror/Mosby College Pub. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED249054

Gullo, D. F. (2005). Understanding assesment and evaluation in early childhood education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Kemdikbud. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 68, Tahun 2013, Tentang Kerangka Dasar Dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (2013). Indonesia.

Kemdiknas. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 22, Tahun 2006, tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah (2006).

Kulsum, U. (1994, October 13). Undang - undang sisdiknas no 20 tahun 2003 tentang kurikulum pendidikan diniyah formal dan implementasinya di pondok pesantren Nurul Qodim Kalikajar kecamatan Paiton kabupaten Probolinggo. Retrieved from http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/16422/

Majid, A., & Rochman, C. (2014). Pendekatan ilmiah dalam implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Marwanto, A. (2008). Kesesuaian pola mengajar guru SMK di DIY dengan tuntutan pembelajaran dalam penerapan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 17(1), 23–38. http://doi.org/10.21831/JPTK.V17I1.7649

Maryani, I., & Fatmawati, L. (2015). Pendekatan scientific dalam pembelajaran di sekolah dasar: teori dan praktik. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Maryani, I., & Martaningsih, S. T. (2017). Primary school teachers’ perception about curriculum 2013 assessment system. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 153. http://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2017.v7.i2.p153-164

Natital, J. (2009). Evaluasi penerapan Kurikulum 2006 pada SMA Negeri di Kota Ambon. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sarjono, H & Julianita, W. (2011). SPSS vs LISREL sebuah pengantar, aplikasi untuk riset. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2002). Evaluation models viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston, MA: Kluwer, Njihoff Publishing.

Sudarmini, N. W., Suarni, N. K., & Lasmana, I. W. (2014). Studi evaluatif implementasi pendekatan paikem pada sekolah dasar di kecamatan payangan. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(0). Retrieved from http://119.252.161.254/e-journal/index.php/jurnal_ep/article/view/1220

Sund, R. B., & Trowbridge., L. W. (1973). Teaching science by inquiry in the secondary school. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.

Supianto, A., Matsum, J. H., & Rosyid, R. (2014). Persepsi guru IPS terhadap Kurikulum 2013 (Studi kasus pada SMP Negeri 10 Pontianak). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(8). Retrieved from http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/6671

Tillery, B. W., Enger, E. D., & Ross., F. C. (2004). Integrated science. McGraw-Hill.

Wang, Y. (2011). Inquiry-Based Science Instruction and performance literacy for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 156, 239–254. http://doi.org/10.2307/26235154

Wenno, I. H. (2010). Pengembangan model modul IPA berbasis problem solving method berdasarkan karakteristik siswa dalam pembelajaran di SMP/MTs. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2(2).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33292/petier.v1i1.17

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 252 times
FULLTEXT PDF - 121 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our Journal indexed by:

Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research
ISSN: 2622-5506

Creative Commons License
Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://petier.org/index.php/PETIER.

 

PETiER Stats